APHC010036162025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 227/2025 Between: 1. VADDI. SATYA, S/O LATE.UPPAIAH, AGE, 50 YEARS, OCC, COOLIE, H NO. 1-308, LINGAMPARTHI VILLAGE, ELESWARAM MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. R VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN. AGE 62 YEARS, OCC, TAHSILDAR, ELESWARAM MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 2. A KUSHAL RAJU, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGED MAJOR OCC DY TAHSILDAR AND FACT TAHSILDAR ELESWARAM MANDAL KAKINADA DISTRICT R 2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 10.03.2026, VIDE IA NO-1/2026 IN CC NO-227 OF 2025 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondent for the willful violation and deliberate disobedience to the orders passed by His Lordship Honble Sri Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, as made in WP No 23968 of 2024, Dated 23-10-2024, under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the petitioner to implead the proposed respondent as party respondent No 2 in the above contempt case in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHALLAGALI GOPALARAJU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 2. K M KRISHNA REDDY 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Ch. Gopala Raju, Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri Ramarao Kochiri, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent No.1 and Sri B. Ramesh, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent No.2. 2. This Contempt Case has been filed complaining of non-compliance of Para-3 of the Order of this Court dated 23.10.2024 in W.P.No.23968 of 2025. This Court had directed the Respondents to pass Speaking Order in accordance with law within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of passing of the Order and the said six (06) weeks time would end by 2nd week of December-2024. 3. Sri Ramarao Kochiri, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent No.1 has drawn the attention of this Court to the contents of the Counter-Affidavit. At page-8 of the Counter-Affidavit, the Proceedings of the Tahsildar dated 21.12.2024 had been placed. 4. This Court is satisfied with the conduct of the Respondent that the Order of this Court had been complied with, although it is belated by about a week or ten (10) days. 5. In this view of the matter, this Contempt Case is closed as no cause survives. Needless to state that the Writ Petitioner always has the liberty to assail the Order passed by the Tahsildar dated 21.05.2024, if so advised. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 30.03.2026 Mnr 4 129 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 227 OF 2025 Dt: 30.03.2026 MNR