SROBAT NAZ AND ANR v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY HOME DEPTT AND ORS
WP(C)/1816/2026 · 2026-06-16
Rajesh Sekhri
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1548 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1548 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 1816/2026 CAV No. 1360/2026
Srobat Naz and Anr.
….. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Ajaz Chowdhary, Advocate Through virtual mode q
vs
UT of J&K and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 16.06.2026
CAV No. 1360/2026
1. None for the caveator, caveat stands discharged.
WP(C) No. 1816/2026
01. The petitioners having attained the age of majority have entered into wedlock out of their free will and volition. Petitioners have placed on record their respective Date of Birth Certificates, issued by the competent authorities. The petitioners, however, apprehend danger to their matrimonial life at the hands of private respondents.
02. It is trite in law that any person having attained the age of consent is entitled to marry as per his/her choice and the Government, in particular the police agency is under an obligation to protect the life of its citizens. It appears that petitioners have not approached the official respondents for indulgence in the matter.
03. Having regard to the limited nature of controversy and the relief prayed for, the present petition is admitted to hearing at its threshold and is disposed of by providing that official respondents shall look into the grievance of the petitioners for adequate security cover to Sr. No. 18
2 WP(C) No. 1816/2026
make sure that nobody is allowed to interfere in their matrimonial life, provided there is no legal impediment.
04. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion about validity or authenticity of the marriage and the documents/certificates annexed with the petition and this order shall not come in the way of the police agency for investigation of FIR/criminal complaint, if any, filed against the petitioners.
05. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
Jammu 16.06.2026 Rahul Sharma