Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15473 (CHH)

MANHARAN LAL NIRMALKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/156/2026 · 2026-01-15

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:2647 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 156 of 2026 1 - Manharan Lal Nirmalkar S/o Budhram Nirmalkar Aged About 64 Years R/o- Village Mahmand, Police Station- Torwa, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, New Raipur, Police Station Kewli, Tahsil, District Raipur (C.G.). 2 - Superintendent Of Police Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). 3 - Station House Officer Police Station Chakarbhatha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). 4 - Deepnarayan Rajak Aged About 25 Years (Now 40 Years), S/o Kushalram Rajak, R/o- Village Parsada, Police Station Chakarbhatha, District- Bilaspur (C.G.). ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, Advocate. For State : Ms. Sunita Manikpuri, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Judgment on Board 16/01/2026 SOURABH PATEL Digitally signed by SOURABH PATEL Date: 2026.01.16 14:59:53 +0530 2 1. By this petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, the petitioner seeks a direction to take appropriate action against respondents No. 1 and 3 to arrest respondent No. 4 and further seeks a direction to the trial Court to take action against respondents No. 1 to 3, if they failed to arrest respondent No. 4. 2. The Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.10.2025, passed in ACQA No. 479/2010 and ACQA No. 47/2011, has given direction at para 37 which reads as under:- 37. A1-Deep Narayan Rajak is directed to surrender before the IX Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Bilaspur (C.G.) within a period of one month from today for serving sentence imposed upon him by this court, failing which, he shall be taken into custody for serving the sentence imposed by this Court and compliance report be submitted to this Court. 3. In view of the direction given by the Division Bench of this Court, no further direction in this petition would be necessary to arrest the respondent No. 4 as specific direction was already given in respect of accused Deep Narayan Rajak. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is hereby dismissed at motion stage itself. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Sourabh P.