Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15468 (GAU)

ABDUS SATTAR AHMED v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./3076/2026 · 2026-09-30

Shamima Jahan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010219342026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3076/2026 ABDUS SATTAR AHMED S/O LOKMAN ALI, RESIDENT OF GAGALMARI, JANIA, P.S. BARPETA, DISTRICT-BARPETA,ASSAM. 2: LOKMAN ALI S/O- MUMTAZ SHEIKH RESIDENT OF VILL- GAGALMARI JANIA PO PS- BARPETA DIST-BARPETA ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A ALAM, MR M Z RAHMAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 01.10.2026 Heard Mr. MZ Rahman, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. By this application, the petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Barpeta PS Case No. 336/2026 registered under Sections61(2)/308(6)/308(7)/318(4)/319(2)/112(1)/112(2)/351(2)/3(5) of BNS, 2023. The FIR in connection with which the petitioner was arrested on 05.09.2026 was lodged by the police personnel of Barpeta Police Station stating inter alia that without any authority and without any professional qualification, the petitioner along with nine others had assembled themselves in and around the Police Station and on making business of exploiting members of the public, who come to the Police Station with some police work. 3. I have learned Counsels for both the parties and upon consideration of the same, it is seen that there is no specific allegations made against the petitioner neither any victim has been mentioned to have been victimized by the petitioner or the others mentioned therein and as such, this Court enlarges the petitioner on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Barpeta, under the following conditions: i) the petitioner will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called for. ii) the petitioner will not hamper, tamper with the evidence, neither influence the witnesses connected with the case. iii) the petitioner will not leave the place of jurisdiction without the permission of the concerned Court. Page No.# 3/3 4. Petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant