Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15468 (AP)

T UDAY KUMAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/1638/2019 · 2026-03-01

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010036162019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1638/2019 Between: 1. T UDAY KUMAR, R/.NO.2/18, NARAYANADRI VIHAR, BROADIPET, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REVENUD DEPARTMENT, SECRETERIAT, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, REVENUE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. REVENUE KALAYANA MANDAPAM A C, MANAGED BY THE GUNTUR DISTRICT REVENUE EMPLOYEES WELFARE SOCEITY, GUNTUR, REP.BY ITS ADDL. MANAGER, SRI A.S.R.C. MURTHY, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topray that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not handing over the Revenue Kalyana Mandapam (A.C.) Guntur rep. by its Addl. Manager in faovur of the petitioner while receiving advance of Rs. 35,400/- (Issued Advance Receipt) towards rent including C.G.S.T. 85 S.G.S.T for marriage function of the petitioner's daughter to be held on 14.02.2019 (8.40 AM) as illegal, arbitrary, 2 JS, J W.P.No.1638/2019 unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to hand over the Revenue Kalyana Mandapam (A.C.) Guntur in favour of the petitioner and to pass such other order or orders IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pray that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not handing over the Revenue Kalyana Mandapam (A.C.) Guntur rep. by its Addl. Manager in faovur of the petitioner while receiving advance of Rs. 35,400/- (Issued Advance Receipt) towards rent including C.G.S.T. 85 S.G.S.T for marriage function of the petitioner's daughter to be held on 14.02.2019 (8.40 AM) as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to hand over the Revenue Kalyana Mandapam (A.C.) Guntur in favour of the petitioner and to pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M HEMALATHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 JS, J W.P.No.1638/2019 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 02.03.2026 rsd 4 JS, J W.P.No.1638/2019 20 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1638/2019 Date: 02.03.2026 rsd