Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15467 (RAJ)

MANISHA KUMARI MEENA D/O MEETHA LAL MEENA, WIFE OF RAJESH KUMAR MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/73/2026 · 2026-01-21

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2840] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 73/2026 1. Manisha Kumari Meena D/o Meetha Lal Meena, Wife of Rajesh Kumar Meena, aged about 20 Years, R/o Ramdi, Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan-322027 presently residing At R/o Ekra, Police Station Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan-322702 2. Rajesh Kumar Meena Son of Shrichand, aged about 26 Years, R/o Ekra, Police Station Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan-322702. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent of Police, District Sawai Madhopur. 4. Circle Officer Rural/Nodal Officer, District Sawai Madhopur. 5. S.H.O., Police Station Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur. 6. Meetha Lal Meena Son of Harigovind Meena, R/o Ramdi, Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan-322027. 7. Kamlesh Meena Son of Harigovind Meena, R/o Ramdi, Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan-322027. 8. Mukesh Meena Son of Harigovind Meena, R/o Ramdi, Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan-322027. 9. Lokesh Meena Son of Meetha Lal, R/o Ramdi, Mantown, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan-322027. 10. Neeraj Meena Son of Kamlesh Meena, R/o Ramdi, Mantown, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan-322027 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohd Shakir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 21/01/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled. [2026:RJ-JP:2840] (2 of 3) [CRLW-73/2026] 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.6 to 10 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Vaidik Vivah Sanskar Trust, East Model Town, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh on 05.01.2026. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.6 to 10 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.5-Station House Officer, Police Station Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj) and respondent no.5 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. [2026:RJ-JP:2840] (3 of 3) [CRLW-73/2026] 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /397