SRI PUNEETH SHETTY v. SHREE VENKATARAMANA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY
CRL.RP/327/2026 · 2026-04-22
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15466 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15466 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22416 CRL.RP No. 327 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 327 OF 2026 BETWEEN:
SRI PUNEETH SHETTY S/O PADMANABHA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO.9-158/2, SHREE DURGAMBIKA KRIPA, KUNTALPADY, PADAVU VILLAGE SHAKTHI NAGARA MANGALURU D.K.DISTRICT …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ASHOK KUMAR SHETTY K., ADVOCATE) AND:
SHREE VENKATARAMANA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER MR.GAYAN JAGADISH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT PADMA COMPLEX OPP. INDIANA HOSPITAL PUMPWELL MANGALURU D.K.DISTRICT …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED)
Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22416 CRL.RP No. 327 of 2026
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401(FILED U/S.438 R/W SEC.442 BNSS) CR.P.C. BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE
JUDGMENT AND
ORDER OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 12.08.2024 MADE IN C.C.NO.364/2023 BY THE COURT OF JMFC (VIII) D.K., MANGALURU AND JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 09.01.2026 MADE IN CRL.A.NO.211/2024 BY THE COURT OF I ADDL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT D.K, MANGALURU AND ACQUIT HIM OF THE OFFENCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo. Memo reads as under:
" It is submitted that the matter is settled between the parties hence the matter may be disposed in the interest of justice. ".
2. Placing the memo on record, petition stands dismissed as settled.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22416 CRL.RP No. 327 of 2026
3. However, if the contents of the memo is incorrect, respondent is at liberty to execute the order.
4. Amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant if not already withdrawn, under due identification.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
SNC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 36