MAMTA KUMARI D/O SONA RAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/1266/2026 · 2026-01-23
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15464 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15464 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3218] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1266/2026
1. Mamta Kumari D/o Sona Ram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Vpo Ratanpura, Tehsil Chitalwana District Jalore, Rajasthan.
2. Anil Bishnoi S/o Bhagirath Bishnoi, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vpo Siwada, Tehsil Chitalwana, District Jalore, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The District Education Officer (Hqrs), Elementary Education, Jalore. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 23/01/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has relied upon the dictum encapsulated in Nimbark Lal Vaishanva Versus State (Panchayati Raj Dep) Ors., S.B. C.W.P. No.17541/2015 (Annexure-5) and has submitted that despite the fact that the services of the petitioners have to be considered for the regularization, the same has not been taken into account by the respondents.
2. In light of the aforesaid submissions, the petitioners are at liberty to file an appropriate representation before the competent
[2026:RJ-JP:3218] (2 of 2) [CW-1266/2026] authority, relying upon the above-referred dictum, and the same shall be considered by way of a speaking order, within a period of 30 days of filing such representation, in accordance with law.
3. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/26