Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010037582026 2026:GAU-AS:3975 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/79/2026 ABHIJIT HAZARIKA S/O LATE KIRAN CHANDRA HAZARIKA, R/O DA-DHARA BAMUN CHUBURI, MOUZA- HOLESWAR, P.O. AND P.S.- TEZPUR, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM-784104 VERSUS GANDHAR CONCRETE POLE WITH ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 4, BOHRA SADAN, INSIDE NEHRU GATE, BEWAR, DIST- AJMER, RAJASTHAN AND REPRESENTED BY ONE OF THE PARTNERS, SRI SURENDRA BAFNA, S/O DULI CHAND BAFNA, R/O PREVATIKA, 14 BAJRANG COLONY, BIJAY NAGAR, DIST- AJMER, RAJASTHAN - 305624. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B CHAKRAVARTY, A SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : CRP(IO)/80/2026 ABHIJIT HAZARIKA S/O LATE KIRAN CHANDRA HAZARIKA R/O DA-DHARA BAMUN CHUBURI MOUZA- HOLESWAR P.O. AND P.S.- TEZPUR DIST- SONITPUR Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM-784104 VERSUS GANDHAR CONCRETE POLE WITH ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 4 BOHRA SADAN INSIDE NEHRU GATE BEWAR DIST- AJMER RAJASTHAN AND REPRESENTED BY ONE OF THE PARTNERS SRI SURENDRA BAFNA S/O DULI CHAND BAFNA R/O PREVATIKA 14 BAJRANG COLONY BIJAY NAGAR DIST- AJMER RAJASTHAN - 305624 ------------ Advocate for : MR. B CHAKRAVARTY Advocate for : appearing for GANDHAR CONCRETE POLE Linked Case : CRP(IO)/81/2026 ABHIJIT HAZARIKA S/O LATE KIRAN CHANDRA HAZARIKA R/O DA-DHARA BAMUN CHUBURI MOUZA- HOLESWAR P.O. AND P.S.- TEZPUR DIST- SONITPUR ASSAM-784104 VERSUS GANDHAR CONCRETE POLE WITH ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 4 BOHRA SADAN INSIDE NEHRU GATE BEWAR DIST- AJMER RAJASTHAN AND REPRESENTED BY ONE OF THE PARTNERS SRI SURENDRA BAFNA Page No.# 3/3 S/O DULI CHAND BAFNA R/O PREVATIKA 14 BAJRANG COLONY BIJAY NAGAR DIST- AJMER RAJASTHAN - 305624 ------------ Advocate for : MR. B CHAKRAVARTY Advocate for : appearing for GANDHAR CONCRETE POLE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 18.03.2026 Heard Mr. B Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since these three revision petitions arises out of the same suit, while filing the revision petitions, inadvertently the impugned orders have wrongly been tagged and accordingly, seeks withdrawal of these three revision petitions, with liberty to file afresh. Prayer is allowed. These three revision petitions accordingly stands dismissed, on being withdrawn. Let Registry return the certified copies of the impugned orders to Mr. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioner, to enable him to file afresh. JUDGE Comparing Assistant