Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15457 (KAR)

SRI. HARISHA S K v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CCC/450/2024 · 2026-03-12

Anu Sivaraman, Tara Vitasta Ganju

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14911-DB CCC No. 450 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 450 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. HARISHA S K S/O T KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS WORKING AS HINDI TEACHER MORARJI DESAI RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL (ST) HUNASE DODDI, KOOTAGAL HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT RAMANAGARA-571 511. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. RAVIKUMARA B. R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE M S BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. …PROFORMA RESPONDENT Digitally signed by PAVITHRA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14911-DB CCC No. 450 of 2024 2. PRAVEEN BAGEWADI THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETARY KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION SOCIETY COOPERATIVE BOARD BUILDING 6TH AND 7TH FLOOR, NEAR CHANDRIKA HOTEL CUNNINGHAM ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 …ACCUSED (BY SRI. RAHUL CARIAPPA, AGA FOR R1; SRI. SRINIVASA C., ADV. FOR R2) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED PERSONS FOR VIOLATING THE ORDER DATED 06.10.2023 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO.14204/2021 (S-RES) VIDE ANNEXURE-B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14911-DB CCC No. 450 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that the directions of the learned Single Judge have been complied with. 2. We notice that on the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the complainant sought time to secure instructions with regard to compliance. 3. In view of the fact that service weightage has been granted and appointment has also been given to the complainant, we find that there is substantial compliance of the directions of the learned Single Judge. The Contempt of Court Case is accordingly closed. Notice issued to the accused shall stand discharged. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE PN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 37