1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 213 CRM-M-8822-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 11.05.2026 Yogender @Rinku ..... Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Haryana ..... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Pragyat Bhardwaj, Advocate for for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Verma, AAG Haryana. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral) Custody Certificate has been filed by learned State Counsel. The same be taken on record. 2. At the outset, it has been contended by learned State Counsel that in the present case as per list of witnesses, 19 prosecution witnesses are there and out of 19, 15 have already been examined. 3. In view of abovementioned contention, the learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that instead of pressing this petition for regular bail, at this stage, he would like to seek a direction to the learned trial Court to dispose of the trial in a timebound manner. 4. In view of above, the present petition with regard to regular bail is hereby dismissed as withdrawn at this stage. However, the learned trial VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.05.11 19:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 Court is directed to conclude the trial within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of present petition. 5. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 11.05.2026 Vinod Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.05.11 19:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document