APHC010033382026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 2121/2026 Between: 1. G SIRISHA, W/O. LAKSHMI NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, D.NO. 1-335, RUDRAMPETA VILLAGE, ANANTHAPUR MANDAL AMP DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT (ASSIGNMENTS),A.P. SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238. 2. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, AT ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT-515001. 3. 3. THE REVENUVEDISVISIONALOFFICER, ANANTAPUR DIVISION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT-515001. 4. 4. THE MANDAL REVENUVE OFFICER, YADIKI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT-515408. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order or direction, more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in attempting to dispossess the petitioner from her land measuring an extent of 2.21 cents in Survey No. 182, situated at Vemulapadu Village, Yadiki Mandal, Ananthapur District, without issuing any notice and without following the due 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.2121 of 2026 process of law, as arbitrary, illegal, and unconstitutional, and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BANDI SRIHARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.2121 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in attempting to dispossess the petitioner from her land measuring an extent of Ac.2.21 cents in Sy.No.182, situated at Vemulapadu Village, Yadiki Mandal, Ananthapur District, without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 23.01.2026 submits that the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are not interfering with the possession of the subject property and they are not acquiring the same for the purpose of assignment to the landless poor persons as alleged by the petitioner. 4. In view of the statement made and recording the said instructions, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. The written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 23.01.2026, shall be made as part of the Court record. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.2121 of 2026 As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 27.01.2026 PGT