Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15450 (AP)

Chennareddygari Ankalamma alias Anitha v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/2161/2026 · 2026-03-09

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010034222026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 2161/2026 Between: 1. CHENNAREDDYGARI ANKALAMMA ALIAS ANITHA, , AGED 52 YEARS, W/O. CHENNAREDDYGARI RAMA MOHAN REDDY, H.NO.30-726-A9, BOMMALASATRAM, NANDYAL TOWN, NANDYAL DISTRICT - 518501. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522237 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT.518501 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, COLLECTOR OFFICE, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT.518501 4. DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER, COLLECTOR OFFICE, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT.518501 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT.518501 6. THE TAHSILDAR, NANDYAL URBAN, NANDYAL DISTRICT.518501 7. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, NANDYAL URBAN MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT.518501 2 BKM,J W.P.No.2161 of 2026 8. B G RAMESH CHANDRA BABU B G RAMESH, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O. B.G. NARASIMHULU, H.NO. 16/73, ROJAKUNTA STREET, NANDYAL TOWN, NANDYAL DISTRICT - 518501. 9. B G SATEESH CHANDRA BABU B G SATEESH, , AGED 62 YEARS, S/O. NARASIMHULU, H.NO. 16/73, ROJAKUNTA STREET, NANDYAL TOWN, NANDYAL DISTRICT - 518501. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. V NITESH 3. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 3 BKM,J W.P.No.2161 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 7 and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.8 and 9. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the 4th respondent in initiating and proposing to conduct Record of Rights (ROR) enquiry and survey in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.2.01 cents in Sy.No.419/2 of Moolasagaram Village, Nandyal Mandal, Nandyal District pursuant to the representation dated 05.01.2026 of the respondent Nos.8 and 9 and the notice dated 12.01.2026 issued by the 4th respondent. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 3rd respondent submits that as per the orders of the 3rd respondent the field inspection was conducted on 06.02.2026 after issuing prior notices to all the parties concerned. The petitioner and the unofficial respondents herein along with their counsels attended the inspection and the petitioner raised objections on the ground of pendency of the suit before the Civil Court and submitted written representation, which was received. During the inspection, demarcation of Ac.1.43 cents as per the Pattadar Pass Books (Ac.0.71 ½ cents each in the names of Sri B.G. Ramesh and Sri B.G. Suresh) and separate demarcation of Ac.0.59 cents as per the boundaries mentioned in Doc.No.2525/1990 dated 05.11.1990 were 4 BKM,J W.P.No.2161 of 2026 completed. The Field Measurement Book (FMB) dated 09.02.2026 reflects as under: Field status as per PPBs- The combined extent of Ac.1-43 cents standing in the names of the BG.Ramesh & B.G Sateesh is shown with precise boundary measurements, subdivision markings, adjoining survey numbers, and present enjoyment position as verified on ground. Field status as per registered document boundaries - The extent of Ac.0-59 cents is separately delineated strictly in accordance with the boundaries described in Doc.No.2525/1990, with side measurements and boundary alignment clearly indicated. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the 3rd respondent shall cause service of the above said survey report to the parties concerned specifically to the petitioner and the unofficial respondents herein. The said instructions of the 3rd respondent shall be made as part of the Court record. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 10.03.2026 PGT