Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15441 (RAJ)

ANIL S/O SHRI GOPAL SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/654/2026 · 2026-01-16

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1852] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 654/2026 Anil S/o Shri Gopal Singh, R/o Higonta, Police Station Khedali Mod, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur. (Accused Presently Confined In District Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mamraj Jat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 16/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.357/2025 registered at Police Station Shahpura, Jaipur Rural for the offences under Sections 189(2), 140(1), 309(4), 115(2), 127(2) & 111(2)(b) of BNS, 2023 and Section 3/25(6) Arms Act. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 4. The accused-petitioner has been implicated in this case on the ground that the weapons were used by the co-accused in the commission of offence made made available by the present accused-petitioner. [2026:RJ-JP:1852] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-654/2026] 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has been implicated in this case merely on the statements of the co-accused which cannot be read against the present accused-petitioner without there being any other incriminating evidence against him. 6. It is also submitted that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 06.12.2025 and there is no other criminal case pending against him. 7. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 8. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and the fact that the accused-petitioner has been arrayed as an accused only on the statements of the co-accused and there are no criminal antecedents against him, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 9. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /21