Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15439 (CHH)

SMT. SARITA YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7081/2025 · 2026-01-11

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:1775 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7081 of 2025 1 - Smt. Sarita Yadav W/o Shri Vijay Kumar Yadav Aged About 45 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Government Primary School, Sirsida, Block- Charama, District- Kanker Chhattisgarh- 494337. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh- 492002. 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh- 492002. 3 - Collector, Collector Complex, District- Kanker Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Education Officer, D E O Office, District- Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Block Education Officer, Block- Charama, District- Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Revenue) President Of Block Level Committee Block- Charama, District- Kanker, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : None For Respondent-State : Ms. Akansha Verma Dabhodkar, Panel Lawyer SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.01.12 18:16:30 +0530 2 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 12/01/2026 1. When the matter is taken up for hearing in second round, none appeared on behalf of petitioner. Even in the first round, there was no representation on behalf of petitioner. 2. Petitioner has submitted special request for listing of this matter urgently mentioning therein that in view of rationalization policy dated 2.8.2024, petitioner intends to withdraw this writ petition. 3. In the above circumstance, as there is no representation on behalf of petitioner even when the case is taken up for hearing in second round, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-