Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15438 (BOM)

VIKRANT VIJAY MANEKAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLN/3674/2026 · 2026-09-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17appln3673-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 17 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3673 OF 2026 IN APPLN/559/2025 Vijay Vasantrao Manekar And Others VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3674 OF 2026 IN APPLN/560/2025 Vikrant Vijay Manekar VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another ... Mr. Rohit Patwardhan h/for Jadhav Satej S, Advocate for Applicants Mr. S. D. Ghayal, APP for the Respondent-State Mr. s. S. Nade, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : 28th September, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned Advocate for the applicants as well as learned Advocate for the respondent-complainant. 2. These applications are filed for restoration of original proceedings which came to be dismissed on the ground that the directions given to carry out amendment was not obeyed within specified time. The learned Advocate for the applicants assures this Court that necessary amendment will be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. The assurance is accepted. Amended copy be served on the learned Advocate for the respondent in advance. 1 of 2 17appln3673-26 3. Both the learned Advocates jointly submits that the parties have amicably settled the dispute among themselves and the original proceedings can be considered in the light of the said amicable settlement. 4. In view of the above the applications are allowed. 5. List the original proceedings on 15.10.2026. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) JPChavan 2 of 2