[2026:RJ-JP:2412] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 821/2026 Yaksh Construction Company, Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Son Of Shri Devkaran Singh, Aged About 36 Years, Resi- dent Of Ward No. 1, Meelon Ka Bas, Nawalgarh, Jhunjhunu, Ra- jasthan Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. RJ 18 GD 4290 And Rj18Gc7293. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary. 2. Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary. 3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Sikar, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 5. District Transport Officer, Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore, AAAG on behalf of Mr. S. S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 20/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for both the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present matter is squarely covered by the judgments passed by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court [2026:RJ-JP:2412] (2 of 3) [CW-821/2026] in the matters of Kanwar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.1 and Mustak & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.2 2. In view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, since there is serious dispute about the service of notice prior to suspension of registration certificates, as the petitioner deny the service, whereas the respondents claim due service of notice. Be that as it may, while keeping the said issue open, with the consent of the parties, the suspensions are set aside, as the said vehicle is the source of bread and butter for the petitioner and his family. 3. However, the aforementioned setting aside/revocation shall only be effective subject to the condition that the petitioner will produce his vehicle before the Transport Department, who will examine and inspect the vehicle’s make and design; and in case any mechanical alteration or overloading is found, a detailed inventory shall be prepared and appropriate orders shall be passed strictly in accordance with law. 4. This arrangement shall be valid only for carrying the vehicle to the respective office of DTO for the aforesaid verification/ inspection and shall not authorize the vehicle to ply on the road for any other purpose. 5. The petitioner, along with his vehicle concerned, shall report to/ before the respective DTO who passed the order of suspension of registration of the subject vehicle, on 03.02.2026, preferably between 11:00 A.M. to 01:00 P.M. Thereafter, due reply shall be filed within a period of 15 days by the petitioner. 1 S.B. C.W.P. No.9721/2025 2 S.B. C.W.P. No.20073/2025 [2026:RJ-JP:2412] (3 of 3) [CW-821/2026] 6. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by the competent authority on 17.02.2026. Adjudication of the same shall be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 8. Any other pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/46