Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15436 (RAJ)

FARID S/O KAMRUDIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/954/2026 · 2026-01-24

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3391] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 277/2026 Mursaleem Son Of Rati Khan, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Jiraheda Police Station, Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 954/2026 Farid S/o Kamrudin, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Maliki, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sakir (Present in Person), Mr. Kamrudin (Present in Person) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP, Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP and Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. Govt. Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 24/01/2026 1. Mr. Sakir b/o Mursaleem and Mr. Kamrudin f/o Mr. Farid are representing the accused-petitioners Mr. Mursaleem and Mr. Farid respectively. Advocates are not appearing today in the Court. Mr. Sakir and Mr. Kamrudin have submitted photocopy of their Aadhar Card. [2026:RJ-JP:3391] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-277/2026] 2. The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 169/2025 registered at Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 308(2), 61(2)(a) and 338 of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. 3. It is contended by brother and father of the accused- petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Mursaleem Son Of Rati Khan and 2. Farid S/o Kamrudin in connection with FIR No. 169/2025 registered at Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg, shall be enlarged on bail provided both [2026:RJ-JP:3391] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-277/2026] of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/82-83