NARENDRA MOURYA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/23532/2026 · 2026-10-06
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing, Tarun Saxena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15434 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15434 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23532 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned first information report dated 05.07.2026 registered as Case Crime No.587 of 2026, U/S-85, 115(2), 352, 74, 75 of B.N.S. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station- Izzatnagar, District-Bareilly (annexure no.1) to this writ petition. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to not to arrest the petitioners in Case Crime No.587 of 2026, U/S-85, 115(2), 352, 74, 75 of B.N.S. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station- Izzatnagar, District-Bareilly."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners after some length of arguments on merits made an innocuous prayer that before arresting the petitioner police may be directed to follow the principle laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273.
3. Per contra, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State vehemently opposed the petition on merits but he has no objection Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijai Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Narendra Mourya And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. S.N. Tiwari, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions and prayer made by
learned counsel for the petitioners and no objection by learned A.G.A. on innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, we are inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by
learned counsel for the petitioners.
6. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the authorities concerned to ensure the procedure of arrest as per the guidelines of the Supreme Court enshrined in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 and provision of Section 35(3) of B.N.S.S. October 7, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 23532 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad