Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
10.03.2026 Item No.11 Court No.37 CHC (ID-266046) In The High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side
WPA (H) 91 of 2025
Safikul Molla Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Imtiaz Ahmed, Advocate
Mrs. Ghazala Firdaus, Advocate
Mr. Mofakkerul Islam, Advocate
Mr. Sk. Saidullah, Advocate
Mr. Mithun Mondal, Advocate
Mr. Md. Arsalan, Advocate
…for the petitioner
Mr. Sudipto Panda, Advocate
Mr. Aritra Ghosh, Advocate
…for the State
1. Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that, the victim was recovered and was produced before the Child Welfare Committee. He submits that, the victim is presently at a Home as directed by the jurisdictional Child Welfare Committee.
2. Petitioner is represented.
3. Since the victim stands recovered, it would be open to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Child Welfare Committee for custody of the victim. If such an application is made no doubt, the Child Welfare Committee will consider and decide the same in
2 accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. No further order needs be passed in this proceeding.
4. WPA (H) 91 of 2025 is disposed of accordingly.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)