Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15429 (HP)

JAGAT RAM v. THE STATE OF HP

CWP/11599/2026 · 2026-07-14

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 11599 of 2026 Decided on 14th July, 2026 Sh. Jagat Ram …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Daleep Chand, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate Genera, respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Rangil Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Issue notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Rangil Singh, Advocate, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 and respondent No.5, respectively. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that after his superannuation, the retiral benefits, which are due to him, has not been released in his favour. 3. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that the petitioner shall file a representation to the Authority in this regard within two weeks. Decision thereupon shall be taken by the Authority within six weeks thereafter. While deciding the representation of the petitioner, it be taken into consideration that if the retiral benefits due to the petitioner have actually not been paid to him, then, needful be done by the Department forthwith. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 14, 2026 (Vinod)