- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 940 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 2022 SATISH BHUJANGRAO GAIKWAD VERSUS SUJATA W/O. SATISH GAIKWAD AND ANOTHER Mr.M.U.Shelke, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.Deepak K.Rajput, Advocate for the Respondents. ( CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ) DATE : 6th OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. In pursuance to the order dated 29.09.2026, parties have tendered the statement/compromise purshis before this Court. It is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for the purpose of identification. The parties and their respective learned Advocates are present in the Court. It is submitted that in view of the compromise between the parties, the instant criminal revision application can be disposed of. 2. In view of the above, the instant criminal revision application stands disposed of in view of the compromise terms between the parties. khs/Oct.2026/25 2026:BHC-AUG:46791 - 2 - 3. As per the compromise terms/settlement between the parties, the impugned judgment and order dated 23.09.2021 passed by the learned Family Court, Aurangabad in Proceeding No.E-175/2019 is quashed and set aside. ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) khs/Oct.2026/25