[2026:RJ-JP:1299] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 422/2026 Pawan Jain S/o Padam Chand Jain, R/o Village Sarsiya, Police Station Jahajpur, Distt. Bhilwara. (At present Accused Petitioner confined at Central Jail Ajmer, Distt. Ajmer.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Patni For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 13/01/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.338/2022 registered at Police Station Anantpur, District Kota City for offences under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC, 1860. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that though allegation against petitioner is that he induces the amount of Rs.18,00,000/- from petitioner dishonestly by cheating but in fact petitioner has given the cheque of equal amount as security to the victim against the above transaction. He contends that co- accused Maina Devi has been released on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 27.10.2025 on the same ground. Though eight cases have been reported against petitioner as criminal antecedents in one case F.R. has been submitted. [2026:RJ-JP:1299] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-422/2026] Charge-sheet in the present case has already been filed. Petitioner is behind the bars since 18.04.2025. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Pawan Jain S/o Padam Chand Jain, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Anantpur, District Kota City in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to [2026:RJ-JP:1299] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-422/2026] immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future. (iii) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/171