Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15423 (CHH)

THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER v. M/S SHYAMLAL AGRAWAL ENGINEERS AND BUILDERS

MCC/1271/2025 · 2026-01-12

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:1887 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1271 of 2025 1 - The Chief General Manager South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Gevra Area, P.O. Gevra Colliery, District Korba, Chhattisgarh 2 - The General Manager Civil South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh --- Applicants versus 1 - M/s Shyamlal Agrawal Engineers And Builders Anand Station Road, Raigarh, Through Its Partner Shri Shyamlal Agrawal, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh --- Respondent MCC No. 1217 of 2025 1 - The Chief General Manager South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Gevra Area, P.O. Gevra Colliery, District Korba, Chhattisgarh 2 - The General Manager Civil South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Applicants Versus 1 - M/s Shyamlal Agrawal Engineers And Builders, Anand Station Road, Raigarh, Through Its Partner Shri Shyamlal Agrawal, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent (Cause title, as taken from CIS) For Applicants For Respondent : : Mr. Pankaj Singh, Advocate Mr. Rahul Jha, Advocate (Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order On Board 13/01/2026 1. Heard on I.A. No.01/2025, application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay in filing the instant MCCs. RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.01.16 15:55:04 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the respondent raised his formal objection to allow aforesaid application. 3. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application, which is well supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed and delay of 130 days in filing the instant MCCs is hereby condoned. 4. Also heard on MCCs. 5. These MCCs have been preferred by applicants for restoration of ARBA No.48 of 2017 and ARBA No.49 of 2017, which were dismissed by this Court vide common order dated 17.06.2025 for want of prosecution. 6. Learned counsel for the respondent raised his formal objection. 7. Having considered the reasons mentioned in the application, these MCCs are allowed. Registry is directed to restore ARBA No.48/2017 (The Chief General Manager & Anr. vs. M/s Shyamlal Agrawal) and ARBA No.49/2017 in its original number. 8. Accordingly, these MCCs are allowed. 9. After restoration of ARBA No.48/2017 and ARBA No.49/2017, it be listed for hearing in the month of February, 2026. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Rukhsar