- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13513 WP No. 19971 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 19971 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI K.N.RAJARAM S/O LATE SHRI NINGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT KEREMAKKI VILLAGE, AVATHI HOBLI CHIKMAGALUR TALUK-577101 2. SMT A K INDARAMMA S/O LATE SHRI NINGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT KEREMAKKI VILLAGE, AVATHI HOBLI CHIKMAGALUR TALUK-577101 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANKITH S REDDY.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES (BANKING DIVISION) Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13513 WP No. 19971 of 2022 DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-1 REPRESENTED BY HONBLE RECOVERY OFFICER-2 1ST FLOOR, JEEVAN MANGAL BUILDING NO.4 RESIDENCY ROAD BANGALORE-560025 2. KARNATAKA GRAMIN BANK (ERSTWHILE KAVERI GRAMEENA BANK) CHIKMAGALUR BRANCH CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT-577101 REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN H., DSG FOR R1; SRI. N. G. RAVIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DTD.6.8.2022 IN DRC NO.12390 IN OA NO.1011/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE RECOVERY OFFICER-II DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I ISSUED UNDER RULES 38, 52(2) OF THE SECOND SCHEME TO THE INCOME TAX 1961 READ WITH THE RECOVERY OF DEBTS AND BANKRUPTCY ACT 1993 ANNEXURE-A; DIRECT THE RESPONDENT BANK TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR ONE TIME SETTLEMENT WITHOUT INITIATING SALE OF THE SCHEUDLE PROPERTY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13513 WP No. 19971 of 2022 ORAL ORDER This writ petition is of the year 2022. On 06.10.2022, an interim order was passed directing the petitioners to deposit a sum of Rs.13.5 lakh on or before 15.01.2023. Thereafter, on 04.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and this Court directed the matter to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal'. 2. Today when the matter came up there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the matter. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE RB