Rinzuala and 68 Ors. v. Smt Aruna Nayar and 6 Ors.
Cont.Cas(C)/5/2024 · 2026-09-30
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15421 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15421 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/7 GAHC030002122024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/5/2024 Rinzuala and 68 Ors. S/o Khetrojoy, R/o Rajtali, Kolasib District 2: Sh Lalengkimtitheia
3: Lungmuana
4: Lallungliani
5: Vanlalthlana
6: Thiamchawngi
7: Ononjoy
8: Nil Bahadur
9: Ramba
10: Ramzauva
11: Daia
12: Nobiram
Page No.# 2/7 13: Lalchawimawia
14: Kapmawia
15: Tlangsan Hmar
16: Tlangsan Hmar
17: Rinchhana
18: Vuana
19: Manjarung
20: Satirai
21: Lawmkima
22: Lawmkima
23: Zorinkima
24: Dula
25: Mohindro
26: Mohindro
27: Dosanga
28: Nokorai
Page No.# 3/7 29: Rammawia
30: Dobola
31: Budasingh
32: Nokurai
33: Taiduha
34: Lalengkima
35: Nasarung
36: Joela
37: Muanpuia
38: Ropuia
39: Nisia
40: Ramliana
41: Mungoti
42: Melkoram
43: Boikhanto
44: Linjorai
Page No.# 4/7 45: Chandiram
46: Chotoino
47: Chotoino
48: Burdirram
49: Nadurai
50: Subidra
51: Rangnangti
52: Jobinti
53: Manui
54: Lalhmangaiha
55: Dilcham
56: Nironjon
57: Lalfakzuala
58: Zothanpuii
59: Ngurchhuanmawia
60: Vanlalhruaii
Page No.# 5/7 61: Lalduhveli
62: S.K.Sanga
63: Lalhmingliana
64: Lalzawmliana
65: Liporjoy
66: Kholoti
67: Lalngilneia
68: Chotoino
69: Lalfakzual VERSUS Smt Aruna Nayar and 6 Ors. IRPS, Secretary, Railway Board, Ministry of Railways, Govt. of India, Room No.227, Rail Bhavan, 1, Raisina Road, New Delhi-110001 2:Sh Satish Kumar Pandey
3:Sh P.K.Kshatriya
4:Sh Vinod Kumar
5:Sh Dinesh Kumar
6:Sh. Arun Kumar Chaudhary
7:Sh. Hitesh Jaiswal
Page No.# 6/7 8:Smt. Anjani Kumar
9:Sh. AK Mishra
10:Sh. Arvind Kumar Meen Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Jonathan L Sailo Advocate for the Respondent : Mr Haresh Gupta
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 01.10.2026
Heard Mr. H. Zodinsanga, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Haresh Gupta, learned counsel for the respondents. It is submitted on behalf of the respondents that the order of this Court in respect of which the present contempt petition has arisen has already been complied with and in this regard, a copy of the Letter dated 28.09.2026 issued by the Deputy Chief Engineer, Construction, NF Railway to the Deputy Commissioner, Kolasib District has been furnished and the same be kept on record. The learned counsel for the petitioners accordingly submits that the matter may be closed.
Page No.# 7/7 Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed upon compliance.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant