MAYALURU NAGARAMA SANJEEVA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/2074/2026 · 2026-01-26
B Krishna Mohan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15417 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15417 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010033212026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 2074/2026 Between:
1. MAYALURU NAGARAMA SANJEEVA REDDY, S/O MAYALURI NAGIREDDY, AGE 34 YEARS, HINDU, R/O BALANAGIREDDY STREET, D.NO.16/128, JAMMALMADUGU
TOWN, JAMMALAMADUGU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH-
522503. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-516001. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, JAMMALAMADUGU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-516434. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, JAMMALAMADUGU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-516434. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th Respondent/Tahsildar, Jammalmadugu, YSR Kadapa District, in rejecting my
2 HBKM,J W.P.No.2074 of 2026
mutation applications dated 17/04/2025, 27/09/2025 and 24/10/2025 as illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India consequently direct the 4th Respondent/Tahsildar, Jammalamadugu, YSR Kadapa District to mutate my name in the revenue records in respect of S.No.349-B-P4 for an extent of Ac.1.25 cents, Jammalmadugu Village, Jammalmadugu Nagara Panchayat, YSR Kadapa District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 4th Respondent/Tahsildar, Jammalamadugu, YSR Kadapa District to mutate my name in Revenue Records for an extent of Ac.1.25 cents in Survey No. 349-B-P4, of Jammalamadugu Village, YSR Kadapa District and Pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A RADHAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
3 HBKM,J W.P.No.2074 of 2026
The Court made the following Order:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the 4th respondent/ Tahsildar, Jammalamadugu, YSR Kadapa District, in rejecting the petitioner’s mutation applications dated 17.04.2025, 27.09.2025 and 24.10.2025. 3.
On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 27.01.2026 submits that the petitioner’s mutation applications dated 03.05.2025, 17.10.2025 and 10.11.2025 were rejected for the reason that the subject land was already registered in favour of one Mr. Avula Ramakrishna Reddy vide registered document No.1843/1998 and on field the petitioner is not in enjoyment and one tomb exists on ground which belongs to the grandfather of the land purchaser Sri Avula Ramakrishna Reddy and also the said purchaser was in enjoyment of the same. Even as per the Encumbrance Certificate several transactions took place on the subject land as it was sold out by the petitioner’s father Mayaluri Nagi Reddy. 4. In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the same was not communicated to the petitioner. 5. In view of the same, the 4th respondent shall communicate the same to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible. If the petitioner is aggrieved of the
4 HBKM,J W.P.No.2074 of 2026
same, appropriate steps can be taken in accordance with law. The written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 27.01.2026 shall be made as part of the Court record. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
27.01.2026 PGT