[2026:RJ-JP:3192] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 341/2026 Rakesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Late Hardev Saini, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Ward No 11, Jiva Ki Dhani Karana, Police Station Basdayal, Tehsil Narayanpur District Kotputli Behrod (Jaipur) ( At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 623/2026 Rishabh Dev Sharma S/o Ashok Kumar Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Saket Colony, Hindaun City, Police Station Hindaun City, District Karauli, At Present Tenant House No. 88, Ratan Sagar Colony, Escone Road, Mansarowar, Police Station Muhana, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chinmay Sharma with Ms. Pooja Soni Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma with Mr. Gaurav Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 23/01/2026 1. The accused-petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.0199/2025 registered with the Police Station Shyam Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for offence under Sections 316(2), [2026:RJ-JP:3192] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-341/2026] 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 308(2), and 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. They further submit that the accused-petitioners are the witnesses of the power of attorney in the name of co-accused Anshul. They further submit that co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. They also submit that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 24.10.2025 and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 4. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsels for the accused-petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsels for the accused-petitioners, so also the fact that co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the accused-petitioners are in custody since 24.10.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:3192] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-341/2026] 6. These bail applications are, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in connected bail application. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /121-122