Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15416 (ALL)

GHANSHYAM JAISWAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/16431/2026 · 2026-10-06

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16431 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "(A) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the Pay Grade of Rs. 4,600/- approved from 28.01.2022 by the respondents in view of the Government Order dated 05.09.2014 as well as Several other Government Orders issued time to time by the respondents in respect of sanctioning the benefits of services including pay grade after completion of satisfactory services of 10 years, 14 years and 26 years respectively of Lab Assistants by giving the Pay Grade of Rs. 4,600/- after their retirement. (B) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to make of payment of pensionary benefits keeping in view of pay grade of Rs. 4,600/- approved on 28.01.2022 with interest and also the arrears of payment of service benefit/pension for the post of Lab Assistant to the petitioner." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is seeking Pay Grade of Rs. 4,600/- approved from 28.01.2022 by the respondents in view of the Government Order dated 05.09.2014. In this regard, the petitioner has moved a representation/application which is pending consideration. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harish Chandra, Vikash Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ghanshyam Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate to direct the respondent authority to decide the representation/application of the petitioner within a time frame as fixed by this Court. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent authority to consider and decide the aforementioned representation/application of the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 7, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 16431 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad