THE STATE OF MAH THROU COLLECTOR AURANGABAD AND ANR v. VILAS BHAURAO CHAVAN
CA/3626/2009 · 2026-09-30
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15412 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15412 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 317 FIRST APPEAL NO. 535 OF 2010 THE STATE OF MAH THROU COLLECTOR AURANGABAD AND ANR VERSUS VILAS BHAURAO CHAVAN ... AGP for Appellants/State : Mr. A.M. Phule Advocate for Respondents : Mr. D.A. Bide h/f. Mr. C.K. Sonwane ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3626 OF 2009 IN FA/535/2010 ...
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. Dated : September 30, 2026 PER COURT :-
1. As the acquisition proceeding is of the year 1986, heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel for respective parites.
2. By this appeal, the Appellants assail the Judgment and award dated 12.02.2008 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge-1, Aurangabad in LAR No. 594/1997.
3. Both the learned counsel for the parties submit that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer.
4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4
dated
03.11.2016
with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times.
5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned
order. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed.
6. In view of dismissal of Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly.
( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) ssc/ 2026:BHC-AUG:46284