Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15412 (AP)

NARAPU REDDY SRINIVASA REDDY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/2965/2026 · 2026-02-10

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010036822026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2965/2026 Between: 1. NARAPU REDDY SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O. NARAPU REDDY VASUDEVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.5/81, MACHUPALLE, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. MEKALA CHANDRA OBULA REDDY,, S/O. MEKALA KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1/4, MACHUPALLE, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT - 516001. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT - 516001. 4. THE CHINNACHOWK POLICE STATION, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS STATION HOUSE OFFICER - 516002. 5. TELLAPATI DHANUNJAYA, S/O. LATE TELLAPATI ADINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2/1237, CHALAMAREDDY PALLI, KADAPA DISTRICT - 516004. 2 6. TELLAPATI YANDAMMA, W/O. LATE TELLAPATI ADINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2/1237, CHALAMAREDDY PALLI, KADAPA DISTRICT - 516004. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SHAIK MD UMAR ABDULLAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief: <…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the writ of MANDAMUS declaring challenging A) the action of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 herein in interfering with the Petitioner's possession in respect of the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.14 cents out of Ac.1.01 cents in Sy.No.1066/5B situated in Ukkayapalli Gram Panchayat, Kadapa Municipal Corporation, YSR Kadapa District at the behest of the Respondents No.5 and 6 herein and consequently threatening the Petitioners to relinquish their rights, title and possession in favor of the Respondents No. 5 and 6 herein as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction besides violating Petitioner's rights guaranteed under Article 14, 21, 22 and 300A of Ifie Constitution of India, and B) the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 herein in not taking any action pursuant to the complaint dated 03.11.2025 submitted by the Petitioners herein as sheer arbitrary, unjust, illegal and contrary to the Section 173 of BNSS and being violative of Articles 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No. 2 to 4 herein to consider the complaint dated 03.11.2025 forthwith in accordance with the law …= 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. N.Srinivasa Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Respondent/Police have been unnecessarily interfering in a civil dispute, and that the complaint lodged by the Petitioners on 03.11.2025 has not been acted upon by Respondent No.4. 4. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that Respondent No.5 filed W.P.No.8245 of 2023 and obtained an order for police protection. Respondent No.4 has considered the representation of the Petitioners and noticed that a civil dispute is pending between the Petitioners and the unofficial Respondents. 4 5. Recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 not to further interfere in the civil dispute pending between the Petitioners and the unofficial Respondents. The Petitioners are granted liberty to file a private complaint against the unofficial Respondents, and upon such complaint being filed, the learned Jurisdictional Magistrate shall proceed in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 11.02.2026 PRA 5 91 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2965 of 2026 Date: 11.02.2026 PRA