Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15410 (RAJ)

SHANKAR @ RAJENDRA S/O GOPAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/747/2026 · 2026-01-19

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2067] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 747/2026 Shankar @ Rajendra S/o Gopal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Bagariyon Ki Dhani, Haripura, Police Station Narena, District Jaipur. (At Present In Judicial Custody At Sub Jail Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Pareek For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.186/2025 registered with the Police Station Phulera (Jaipur Rural), District Jaipur Rural for offence under Sections 331(4) & 305(a) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that co-accused namely; Rajesh & Omprakash @ Lala have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 09.01.2026. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 10.12.2025 and trial of the case will take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. [2026:RJ-JP:2067] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-747/2026] 4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, so also the fact that co-accused namely; Rajesh & Omprakash @ Lala have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 09.01.2026 and the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 10.12.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /7