Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15410 (KAR)

SRI ANIL T J v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/1143/2026 · 2026-02-10

B M Shyam Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8005 WP No.1143/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO.1143/2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI ANIL T J S/O. LATE. JANARDHAN AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, EDITOR, BELGINA VIDHTHA, SHENOY COMPLEX, AZAD ROAD, TIRTHAHALLI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 432 …PETITIONER (BY SRI.SUNIL KUMAR B N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SHIVAMOGGA DISRTICT, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 401 2. THE TAHSILDAR THIRTHAHALLI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 225. 3. EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYATH, RATHA BEEDHI, SRI RAMA MANDIRA BUILDING, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 225. Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8005 WP No.1143/2026 4. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SHIVAMOGGA ZILLA PANCHAYATH, KUVEMPU ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA CITY, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 401. 5. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NATIONAL HIGHWAY DIVISION, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 401 6. ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAY SUB DIVISION SRINGERI CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 576 201 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.SARITHA KULKARNI, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 BELOW TO CONSIDER MEMORANDUM FILED BY THE PETITIONER PENDING BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 AS PER ANNEXURE A TO A-1 AND A-2 WITHIN 30 DAYS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8005 WP No.1143/2026 ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo which reads as under. "The Petitioner above named humbly prays that, instead of Chief Officer City Municipal Council Thirthahalli by inadvertently made Chief Executive Officer as a party to this Writ Petition. Hence the above Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn in the interest of justice." The memo is accepted and the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB