HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 1826/2026 CM No. 4029/2026 Rohan Kidar Sharma …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Petitioner present in person Vs UT of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE ORDER 16.06.2026 The petitioner, an Advocate by profession, after brief submission, has submitted that he would be satisfied if the official respondents are directed to accord consideration to the applications/representations preferred by him from time to time for providing adequate security. His statement is taken on record. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to consider the representation(s) preferred by the petitioner and provide him necessary protection as per law. (Rajesh Sekhri) Judge Jammu 16.06.2026 Pawan Angotra Sr. No.45 Pawan Angotra 2026.06.16 01:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document