SAIJUDDIN ALI ALIAS SAIZUDDIN ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Bail Appln./2927/2026 · 2026-09-27
Shamima Jahan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15409 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15409 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010210062026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2927/2026 SAIJUDDIN ALI ALIAS SAIZUDDIN ALI S/O-MOTIBOR ALI R/O- PANBARI NEAR MASJID, P.S.- BOGRIBARI, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM. P/A- JALUKBARI, B.G. COLONY, P.S.- JALUKBARI, DIST- KAMRUP(M) VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P., ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MD S ALI, MR KUTUB ALI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 28.09.2026
Heard Mr. S. Ali, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. RJ Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Page No.# 2/3
2. By this application, the petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Paltanbazar PS Case No. 234/2026 registered under Section 305(c) of BNS,
2023. The FIR in connection with which the petitioner was arrested on 07.09.2026 was lodged by the victim stating inter alia that while she got down from the bus, one lady had stolen her mobile phone.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the interrogation, the name of the petitioner surfaced and that the phone was recovered from his possession but he submits that he is not involved in stealing the phone from the informant.
4. Mr. RJ Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, however, submits that the stolen phone was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and that is sufficient to show his complicity.
5. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the parties, more so, in view of the fact that allegation is made against the lady in the FIR and the petitioner was arrayed as accused person on the basis of recovery of the phone and without any materials that the petitioner is also involved in stealing of the phone, this Court enlarges the petitioner on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of CJM, Kamrup(M) under the following conditions: i) the petitioner will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called for. ii) the petitioner will not hamper, tamper with the evidence, neither influence the witnesses connected with the case. iii) the petitioner will not leave the place of jurisdiction without the permission of the concerned Court.
Page No.# 3/3
6. Petition is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant