Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15406 (AP)

M/s. PVSR Constructions v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/3004/2026 · 2026-02-10

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010035552026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 3004/2026 Between: 1. M/S. PVSR CONSTRUCTIONS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER P.SIVA RAMI REDDY S/O. P.V.SUBBA REDDY AGED 59 YEARS RIO H.NO. 1-10, KONDAPURAM VILLAGE DORNIPADU MANDAL NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI AMARAYATI. - 522237 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI.-522237 3. THE ENGINEERINCHIEF PR, GOVERNAMENT OF ANDHRAPRADSEH O/0 PANCHAYATHRAJ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (PRED) AT VIJAYAWADA NTR DISTRICT.-520001 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER PRI, PANCHAYATHRAJ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (PRED) AT VIJAYAWADA NTR DISTRICT.-520001 5. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, O/0 PANCHAYATHRAJ DEPARTMENT PR CIRCLE AT KURNOOL KURNOOL DISTRICT.- 518001 2 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PR, O/0 PANCHAYATHRAJ DEPARTMENT (PRI PLUS PIU) DIVISION AT NANDYAL NANDYAL DISTRICT.-518501 7. UNION BANK OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER ALLAGADDA BRANCH AT ALLAGADDA NANDYAL DISTRICT.- 518543 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the impugned proceedings (1) Procgs.Rc NO.AE1/NABARD R/DF XX/X/Sarvaioalli to Chinthakommadinne /2025 Dated 18-12-25 (2) Procgs. RcNo.AE 1//NA BARD R/DF XXIX/Harivaram to R.Pampalli/2025 Dated 18- 1.2-25 and (3) PrQces.ReNo.AE1/NABARD RIDF XXIX/ Peddabodanam to Thodendlapalli /2025 Dated 18-12-25 and its consequential proceedings RC.No. 89/2026 Dated 09.01.2026 issued by the 6th respondent as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set. aside the same thereby directing the respondents to return the security deposit for the works 1 Providing B. T Surface to the road from Sarvaipalle to Chinthakoma Dinne (Via) Patha Kandhukur of Allagadda. Mandal as per Agreement No. /2023- 2024 dated 23-02-2024 and EMD amount of Rs. 11,11,650/-, Work-2 Providing B. T road from Harivaram to R Pampalli of Uyyalawada Mandal Nandyal District as per Agreement No. /202-2O24 dated 23-02-2024, and EMD amount of Rs. 07,9.5,600/-and Work-3 Providing B.Troad from Pedda Bodhanam to Thodendla. palli of.Chagalamarri Mandal in Nandyal District as per Agreement No. /2023-2024 dated 23-02- 2024 and EMD amount of Rs. 06,45,600/- a total amount of Rs.25,52,85.0/- and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings (1) Procgs.Rc NO.AE1/NABARD RIDF XXIX/ Sarvaipalli to Chinthakommadinne /2025 Dated:18-12-25 (2) Procgs. Rc No.AE1/NABARD RIDF XXIX/Harivaram to R.Pampalli/ 2025 Dated:18- 12- 25 and (3) Proces.Re No.AE1/NABARD RIDF XXIX/Peddabodanam to Thodendlapalli /2025 Dated:18-12-25 and proceedings RC.no. 89/2026 3 Dated:09.01.2026 issued by the 5th and 6th respondents pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following order: Smt. Marella Radha, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file a fresh writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file a fresh writ petition. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 11.02.2026 SNI 4 41 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.3004 OF 2026 Dated: 11.02.2026 SNI