Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15404 (AP)

Dasi Jaya Babu v. Sri K. Srinivasa Rao

CC/388/2026 · 2026-03-02

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010032752026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE No. 388/2026 Between: 1. DASI JAYA BABU, S/O.LATE ABBULU AGE 50 YEARS, OCC WORKED AS RECORD ASSISTANT IN AJCJ COURT, TUNI UNDER DISMISSAL FROM SERVICE, NOW DOING COOLI WORKS D.NO. 1-152/1, MADHURA NAGAR, NEAR BENNI GARI CHURCH, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P- 533001 ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI K SRINIVASA RAO, S.H.O. Thulluru P.S, Guntur District, AP ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent for his willful disobedience of order Dt.22-07-2025 passed in CrI.P.No.1257 of 2024 on the file of this Hon'ble Court Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PEDDI VIJAYBHASKAR Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 has been filed by the Petitioner to punish the Respondent/Contemnor for committing wilful violation of the Order passed by this Court dated 22.07.2025 in Crl.P. No.1257 of 2024. At the time of hearing, Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on instructions would submit that after completion of investigation with regard to the subject crime, the Police filed charge sheet before the concerned Trial Court and no further orders are necessary in this matter. Sri Peddi Vijay Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner acceded to the submissions of the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and would submit that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet. Considering the submissions made, this contempt case is closed. Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy of challenging the charge sheet according to law, if so advised. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 03.03.2026 Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE No.388 of 2026 03.03.2026 Mjl/*