Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15403 (CAL)

MEHUL GARD v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRR/4249/2024 · 2026-04-01

Dinesh Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

01.04.2026 Ct. No.42 D/L 1 Mujahid CRR 4249 of 2024 With CRAN 4 of 2026 Mehul Garg Vs. State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Sunil Kumar Singhania Ms. Kalpana Singhania …for the petitioner Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharya Mr. Dattatreya Dutta …for the State 1. Learned counsel for the State has filed the report of Ms. Gita Sutar, LSI of Kalighat P.S. duly forwarded by O.C. Kalighat P.S., Kolkata 700026. 2. The State has verified the settlement between the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for quashing of C.G.R. Case No. 415/24 arising out of Kalighat P.S. Case No.15/24 under Sections 498A/406/325/506/34 of the IPC read with Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 4. However, perusal of CRR 4249 of 2024 indicates that there was no such prayer for quashing of the FIR in the main petition in absence of any such prayer in the main petition. The same cannot be granted by this Court on the mere mention of the prayer in the CRAN 4 of 2026. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a joint petition for quashing of FIR on the basis of mutual settlement. 2 6. Liberty granted. 7. Petition is disposed of. 8. All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)