AJAY GHOSH AND ANR v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS
WP(C)/6397/2021 · 2026-09-27
Arun Dev Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15400 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15400 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010201242021
2026:GAU-AS:14387
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6397/2021 AJAY GHOSH AND ANR S/O LATE SHANTI RANJAN GHOSH, R/O RANGIA RAILWAY STATION ROAD, WARD NO.1, P.O. AND P.S. RANGIA, DIST. KAMRUP(R), ASSAM, PIN 781354 2: GIAS UDDIN CHOUDHURY @ GIAS ALI @ GIAS ALI CHOUDHURY S/O LATE SAMIR ALI @ SAMIR ALI CHOUDHURY R/O RANGIA WARD NO.5 P.O. AND P.S. RANGIA DIST. KAMRUP(R) ASSAM PIN 78135 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, RAIL BHAWAN, NEW DELHI 2:THE GENERAL MANAGER N.F. RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI-11 3:THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERICAL MANAGER N.F. RAILWAY RANGIA DIVISION DIST. KAMRUP(R) ASSAM 4:THE ASSTT. COMMERCIAL MANAGER
Page No.# 2/3 N.F. RAILWAY RANGIA DIST. KAMRUP(R) ASSAM 5:THE STATION SUPERINTENDENT RANGIA RAILWAY STATION DIST. KAMRUP(R) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR T H HAZARIKA, MR M CHETIA,MR A RASHID,MR. K ISLAM,MR N AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : SC, NF RLY,
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
ORDER
28-09-2026
1. Heard Mr. A. Rashid, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Standing counsel, Railways for the respondents.
2. The challenge made in the present writ petition involves Catering licence and subsequent policy of the Railways.
3. Mr. Sarma, learned Standing counsel, Railways, submits that the issue has already been determined in Deepak & Co. and Anr. Vs. the Union of India and Ors.
[WP(C) No. 1828/2023].
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the determination
Page No.# 3/3 made in the aforesaid writ petition, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present writ petition.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant