Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15400 (ALL)

ANITA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/37650/2026 · 2026-10-06

Ajit Kumar, Garima Prashad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37650 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief as substantial relief: "i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2/ District Magistrate, Kaushambi to decide the Application / Claim of petitioner filed on 25/01/2020 (Annexure No. 6), Pending before it expeditiously, within a short period so stipulated by this Hon'ble Court." It appears from the records that the petitioner' claim is already pending before the respondent no. 2. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that respondent no. 2 shall consider the claim of the petitioner and decide the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. October 7, 2026 IrfanUddin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anoop Kumar Nirmal, Rajesh Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Anita Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad