Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010266972025 2026:GAU-AS:2405 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2839/2025 NISHIKANTA DAS AND 3 ORS S/O LATE GIRISH DAS, R/O ASHRAM ROAD, NEAR SUNLIT HOSPITAL, P.O. VIVEKANANDA ROAD, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788001 2: JHARNA DAS W/O LATE GIRISH DAS R/O ASHRAM ROAD NEAR SUNLIT HOSPITAL P.O. VIVEKANANDA ROAD DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001 3: GIRINDRA DAS S/O LATE GIRISH DAS R/O ASHRAM ROAD NEAR SUNLIT HOSPITAL P.O. VIVEKANANDA ROAD DIST. CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001 4: ARATI DAS W/O- GIRINDRA DAS R/O ASHRAM ROAD NEAR SUNLIT HOSPITAL P.O. VIVEKANANDA ROAD DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 78800 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S ROY, M. HOSSAIN,MR. M H LASKAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 18.02.2026 Heard Mr. M. H. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State respondent. This is an application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 praying for granting pre-arrest bail to the accused petitioners, namely, 1. Nishikanta Das, 2. Jharna Das, 3. Girinda Das and 4. Arati Das, in connection with Silchar P.S. Case No. 1017/2025 under Sections 117(2)/118(2)/351(2)/85/89 BNS. The Case diary received. Perused the same. It is submitted by Mr. Laskar that the present petitioners are innocent and that no such incident had happened as alleged in the FIR. However, the petitioners appeared before the I.O. and cooperated in the investigation of the case and they are still ready and willing to extend their cooperation in the further investigation of this case. Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, submitted in this regard that the accused petitioners already appeared before the Investigating Officer, cooperated in the investigation and their statement also recorded by the I.O. Page No.# 3/3 However, as per the injury report, the victim sustained injury in her right hand. On hearing the submissions of both the sides and considering the materials available in the case diary as well as the conduct of the accused petitioners and also considering the injury report of the victim, this Court finds that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be necessary for the interest of the investigation. In view of the above, the orders of interim pre-arrest bail dated 22.01.2026 and 03.12.2025 are hereby made absolute on same terms and conditions. Return the case diary. This anticipatory bail application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant