Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15397 (PNJ)

REKHA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/3929/2026 · 2026-04-06

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-392 IN 178 REKHA STATE OF CORAM: Present: MANISHA 1. Constitutio official resp at the han representati 2. submitted 06.04.2026 raising thei not yet bee submitted t directions Kurukshetr 3929-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIG AND ANOTHER Versus TE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS AM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE **** Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advoca Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Hary ISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been titution of India seeking issuance of a ial respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the e hands of respondents No.4 to sentation dated 06.04.2026 (Annexure At the very outset, learned itted that the petitioners have rec 2026 before the Superintendent of Po g their grievances as mentioned in the et been considered and no action ha itted that at this stage, the petitioners tions are issued to respondent N kshetra to decide the aforesaid repre F PUNJAB AND HARYANA NDIGARH CRWP-3929-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.04.2026 ...Petitione ersus ERS ...Responden ICE MANISHA BATRA dvocate for the petitioners , Haryana s been filed under Article 226 of th ce of a writ of mandamus directing th tect the life and liberty of the petitione to 7 and to take action on the nexure P-5). arned counsel for the petitioners ha e recently filed a representation o t of Police, Kurukshetra (Annexure P in the present petition but the same ha ion has been taken thereon. He furth ioners would be satisfied if appropria ent No.2- Superintendent of Polic representation filed by the petitione .2026 titioners ondents of the ting the titioners n their ers has tion on ure P-5) ame has further ropriate Police, titioners AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.06 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-392 and take ne 3. 4. behalf of th due course. course of th 5. commentin disposed of aforesaid re within a p accordance petitioners, order to pro 06.04.2026 Amit Sharma Whe Whe 3929-2026 (O&M) -2 ake necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, H lf of the respondents-State and submit ourse. Let a complete set of the paperb se of the day. In view of the limited prayer enting anything on the merits of t sed of at this stage with a direction said representation dated 06.04.2026 in a period of 15 days from today, rdance with law. Needless to say, ioners, the official respondents would p r to protect their life and liberty. .2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Ye Whether reportable Ye 2- AG, Haryana, has advance notice submits that the needful will be done paperbook be supplied to her during th rayer made by the petitioners, witho ts of the case, the present petition ction to respondent No.2 to decide th .2026 (Annexure P-5) of the petitione oday, by passing a speaking order say, if any threat is found to th ould provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No tice on done in ring the without tition is cide the titioners order in to the curity in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.06 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.