- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7242 WP No. 24889 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 24889 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. RANGASWAMY S/O LATE DODDATHIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT MADAHALLI ROAD, 2ND WARD, GUNDLUPETE, CHAMRAJANAGAR DISTRICT - 571313 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P.N. NANJA REDDY.,ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. NAGAVENI SECRETARY, LITTLE CHAMPS SCHOOL, HORTICULTURE DEPARTMENT, CHAMRAJNAGAR - 571313 GUNDLUPET. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M.R. HIREMATHAD, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE ENTIRE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN EX. NO. 20/2022 PENDING ON THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUNDLEPET (ANNX-C) AS THE SAME ARE ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY AND IN VIOLATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO GRANT ALL THE CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS CONSEQUENT UPON QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS AT ANNX-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7242 WP No. 24889 of 2025 ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “a) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order, quashing the entire Proceedings in Ex. No.20/2022 pending on the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Gundlepet (Annexure-C) as the same are illegal, arbitrary and in violation of the principles of natural justice. b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent to grant all the consequential benefits consequent upon quashing the proceedings at Annexure-C.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent and perused the material on record. 3. After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would file objections to the main execution proceedings and contest the same in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the Executing Court may be directed to dispose of the execution proceedings as expeditiously as possible. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7242 WP No. 24889 of 2025 5. The aforesaid joint submission is placed on record. 6. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to file objections to the main execution petition. Upon the petitioner filing objections, the Executing Court shall consider the same and hear both sides and dispose of the execution proceedings within a period of 6 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. Subject to the aforesaid directions and leaving open all contentions to be decided by the Executing Court, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8