Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15392 (KAR)

SMT MARIGAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/7940/2026 · 2026-03-12

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14909 WP No. 7940 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 7940 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. SMT MARIGAMMA W/O LATE CHIKKAPUTTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 2. SMT. MAHADEVAMMA W/O LATE MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 3. SRI. THIBBAIAH S/O LATE MALIGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT: HEBBIADARAMETLU VILLAGE, HAROHALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 112. … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHARAN N.MAJAGE., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14909 WP No. 7940 of 2026 VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER, KHANIJA BHAVANA, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.14/1, 1ST FLOOR, ARAVINDA BHAVAN, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.S. HARISH, AGA FOR R1; SRI H.L. PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO I) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER, OR DIRECTION, QUASHING THE IMPUGNED GENERAL AWARD BEARING NO. KIADB.LAQ.1524.2013-14 DATED 31.12.2013 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 3, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-F, INSOFAR AS IT PERTAINS TO THE LANDS OF PETITIONER NO. 1 (SY.NO.203/4 AND 203/5) AND PETITIONER NO. 3 (SY.NO.212/4) SITUATED AT JAKKASANDRA VILLAGE, MARALAWADI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14909 WP No. 7940 of 2026 ORAL ORDER The petitioners have sought for setting aside of the General Award dated 31.12.2013 insofar as it pertains to the lands of petitioner No.1 ie., Sy.Nos.203/4 and 203/5 and the land of petitioner No.3 in Sy.No.212/4 situated at * Bannikuppe Village, Harohalli Hobli, Harohalli/Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District (formerly Bangalore South District)" and have also sought a direction to pass orders in terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 by way of agreement. 2. The petitioners have sought for similar relief as regards the land of petitioner No.2 in Sy.No.234/P7 situated in the same village. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent - Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) submits that the petition itself could be disposed of while setting aside the general award insofar as the petitioners are concerned and the respondent - Special Land Acquisition Officer, * Corrected vide Court order dated 27.04.2026. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14909 WP No. 7940 of 2026 KIADB would consider the request of the petitioners and pass a consent award as per law. 4. In light of the said stand and taking note of the directions passed in W.P.No.15026/2021, the petition is disposed of as follows: (i) The impugned general award at Annexure-F and G insofar as the petitioners' land is concerned, is set aside. (ii) Respondent No.3 is directed to consider the claim of the petitioners for passing of consent award and pass a consent award in terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. It is made clear that, in the event of there being any dispute with regard to entitlement and apportionment - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14909 WP No. 7940 of 2026 of the award amount, the general award at Annexure-F and G would stand revived. 6. Liberty is reserved to the Special Land Acquisition Officer, KIADB to withdraw the amount, if deposited before the Civil Court pursuant to the general award. 7. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in terms of the above. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE SHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24