Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010201242021 2026:GAU-AS:14387 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7244/2021 KRISHNA DAS @ KRISHNA MAJUMDER W/O JAWAHAR MAJUMDER RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AT DA 24 SALT LAKE CITY SECTOR 1 KOLKATA WEST BENGAL 700064 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA . MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS RAIL BHAWAN NEW DELHI 2:THE GENERAL MANAGER NF RAILWAY MALIGOAN GUWAHATI 11 3:THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER RANGIA DIVISION RANGIA DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 4:THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER Page No.# 2/4 NF RAILWAY RANGIA DIVISION RANGIA DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 5:THE SECTIONAL COMMERCIAL INSPECTOR NF RAILWAY RANGIA DIVISION ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. A M AHMED Advocate for : SC RAILWAY appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS Linked Case : WP(C)/7167/2021 SUSHIL KUMAR SAH AND 2 ORS S/O LAT RAGHU NATH SAH R/O WARD NO. 2 RANGAPARA RAILWAY STATION DIST- SONITPUR ASSAM PIN-784505 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS RAIL BHAWAN NEW DELHI-110001 2:GENERAL MANAGER N.F. RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI-11 3:THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER (C) N.F. RAILWAY RANGIYA DIVISION RANGIYA DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM 4:THE CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER Page No.# 3/4 N.F. RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI-11 5:SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER N.F. RAILWAY RANGIYA DIVISION RANGIYA DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR S NATH Advocate for : MR B SARMA (SC N.F. RAILWAYS) appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 28-09-2026 1. None appears for the petitioners on call. 2. Heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Standing counsel, Railways Department for the respondents. 3. The challenges made in these writ petitions involve the Catering licence and subsequent policy of the Railways. 4. Mr. Sarma, learned Standing counsel, Railways submits that the issue has already been determined in Deepak & Co. and Anr. Vs. the Union of India and Ors. [WP(C) No. 1828/2023] and that in view of the determination, nothing survives to be Page No.# 4/4 adjudicated in these two writ petitions. 5. Be that as it may, as none appears for the petitioners, the writ petitions stand dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant