APHC010035442026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2214/2026 Between: 1. MULIKI CHANDRAKALA, W/O. GOPI KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO. 401, PLOT NO. 6, SATYADEVA NILAYAM.RAJIVNAGAR, VIJAYAWADA-520015. 2. VUNNAM VENKATA RAVAMMA,, W/O.LATE V. CHANNAKESAWA RAO, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO. 401, PLOT NO. 6, SATYADEVA NILAYAM.RAJIVNAGAR, VIJAYAWADA-520015 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT -522238. 2. THE SUPERINDENT OF POLICE, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT- 522601 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DURGI POLICE STATION, DURGI, PALNADU DISTRICT-522612 4. VUNNAM RAJA SEKHAR, SIGNAL ENGINEER, O/O. SIGNALING AND TELECOM DEPARTMENT, EAST COAST RAILWAY, PARVATIPURAM RAILWAY STATION, MANYAM DISTRICT -535501 5. KAVURI JYOTHI, W/O. K. SIVANAGU, DOOR. NO 5-28, CHAGARLAGUDI PADU, RENTACHINTALA. PIN 522421. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.2214 of 2026 Dated 04.02.2026 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): KHADER VALI SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 3rd Respondent to register the Report and the complient given to investigate the matter and registrar a FIR for attempting to tresspass the said schedule proeprty and thrending the persons in the said schedule proeprty and ignoring the court orders and willfull disobidence or disrecpect towards a court falls under section 12 of the Indian Contempt of Court Act 1971 on the said persons in the complient is illegal arbitrary and contrary to provisions of law laid down by this Honble Court and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to register the case and enquir into it and pass….” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. The grievance of the petitioners is that his complaint was registered by respondent No.3 despite repeated requests. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the police have registered the complaint of petitioner No.1 as a case in Cr.No.13 of 2026 of Durgi Police Station, Palnadu District, 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.2214 of 2026 Dated 04.02.2026 for the offence punishable under Sections 79 and 351(2) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, ‘the BNS’). 5. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.3 to give logical conclusion to the FIR registered against respondent Nos.4 and 5. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 04.02.2026 RSI 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.2214 of 2026 Dated 04.02.2026 41 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 2214 of 2026 Date: 04.02.2026 RSI