RAKESH KUMAR JAT S/O SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD JAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/667/2026 · 2026-01-16
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15389 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15389 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1974] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 667/2026 Rakesh Kumar Jat S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Jat, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Dattawata Jairampura, Police Station Haramada, District Jaipur, (Raj) (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.R. Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. M.I. Abbasi, Adv. Mr. Manish Mishra, Adv. For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Anirudh Singh, Astt. Adv. Mr. M. Shahid Qureshi, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 16/01/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.32/2025, registered at Police Station Khora Bisal, District Jaipur (West), for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of BNS.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is also contended that the petitioner and the complainant have arrived at and amicable settlement and the complainant is present today in the Court along with his counsel. The alleged offences are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the main allegations are against
[2026:RJ-JP:1974] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-667/2026] the other co-accused Vinod Kumar. It is further contended that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 03.12.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner cheated with the complainant and executed an agreement to sale despite knowing the fact he is not the owner of the plot. The petitioner is a habitual offender and against him six cases were registered under various offences in various Police Stations at Jaipur, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed.
4.
Learned counsel Mr. M. Shahid Qureshi, appearing on behalf of the complainant concedes before the Court that the complainant and the petitioner have settled their dispute and if the petitioner's bail application is allowed then the complainant has no objection. The complainant himself is present in person before this Court and has no objection of if this Court grants bail to the accused-petitioner.
5. Heard and perused the material available on the record.
6. Considering the fact that the counsel for the complainant has no objection regarding granting bail to the petitioner and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Rakesh Kumar Jat S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Jat, in connection with FIR No.32/2025, registered at Police Station Khora Bisal, District Jaipur (West), shall be enlarged on bail provided he
[2026:RJ-JP:1974] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-667/2026] furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is
directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava/-241