[2026:RJ-JP:3905] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 818/2026 Anand Kumar Nayak So Rajuram Nayak, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Anandgarh, Police Station Dantor, District Bikaner, Presently Cookmain Hotel Sunshine, Rajat Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Police Station Mansarovar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandra Shekhar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 28/01/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.228/2024 registered at Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur City (South) for offences under Sections 302 and 201 of IPC, 1860. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that in the present matter the main allegations are levelled against the co-accused Arjun Ram and Hanuman. He further submits that the co-accused Arjun Ram Jat has been granted the benefit of bail by the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide order dated 29.07.2025. He also submits that the co-accused Haridas Swami and Hanuman Mal [2026:RJ-JP:3905] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-818/2026] have been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 20.11.2025 and 24.09.2025 respectively. He again submits that the statement of material witness PW-2 Sandeep has been recorded, which does not indicate any specific role of the present petitioner. The brother of deceased, PW-3 Pintu has turned hostile. Petitioner is behind the bars since 11.03.2024. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Anand Kumar Nayak So Rajuram Nayak, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/150