Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15384 (KAR)

SMT CHIKKAVENKATAMMA v. SRI KRISHNAMURTHY

WP/15113/2021 · 2026-02-23

Tara Vitasta Ganju

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11127 WP No. 15113 of 2021 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 15113 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. CHIKKAVENKATAMMA W/O. LATE. CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 2. SMT. MUNIVENKATAMMA D/O. LATE. CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 3. SMT. ESHWARAMMA D/O. LATE. CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT NARAYANAHALLI VILLAGE KAIWARA HOBLI CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT 577101 REF. BY SPA HOLDER OF THE PETITIONER NO.1 MUNIKRISHNAPPA N M A/O LATE. MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT BISANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI SRINIVASAPURA TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT 563101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M SHIVAPRAKASH., ADVOCATE) HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11127 WP No. 15113 of 2021 -2- AND: 1. SRI KRISHNAMURTHY S/O. NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 2. SMT. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA S/O VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 3. SMT. CHIKKAMUNIYAMMA W/O. G V MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 4. SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA W/O. POOJARI MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 5. SRI. KRISHNAPPA S/O. VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 6. SRI. MOGILAHALLI SHIVAPPA S/O. VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT NARAYANAHALLI VILLAGE KAIWARA HOBLI CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT 577101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ASHOK B PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R1 & R5; NOTICE TO R4 & R6 IS H/S, V/O DATED 01.10.2021; STEPS TO BRING THE LRs OF DECEASED R3 STANDS WAIVED V/O DATED 06.11.2021) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN O.S.NO.433/2014 ON THE HON’BLE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT CHINTAMANI AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER AT ANNEXURE G DATED HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11127 WP No. 15113 of 2021 -3- 02.08.2021 ON I.A.NO.16 FILED UNDER ORDER XXVI RULE 9 OF CPC AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL ORDER 1. None appears for the petitioners despite the matter being called out twice. This Court had on 31.01.2026 had passed the following order: “1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners sought for an adjournment. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents points out that petitioner No.1 has died in the year 2021. However, no appropriate steps have been taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners to amend the cause title. 3. A finally, an opportunity is granted to the petitioners to do the needful, failing which the petition shall be dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. List this petition on 23.02.2026. 5. Interim order granted earlier is extended till the next date of hearing. 6. Released from part-heard.” 2. As stated, final opportunity was granted to the petitioners to take appropriate steps. The report of the HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11127 WP No. 15113 of 2021 -4- Registry is that no steps were taken by the petitioners despite repeated opportunities. 3. The petition is accordingly dismissed for non- prosecution. All pending applications stand closed. (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE YN / PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7 Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA