Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15376 (RAJ)

POOJA YOGI W/O PADHAN NATH, D/O SUNGAN NATH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/67/2026 · 2026-01-21

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2842] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 67/2026 1. Pooja Yogi W/o Padhan Nath, D/o Sungan Nath, aged about 19 Years, R/o Jogiyo Ka Nada, Maliyo Ka Badi, Kis- hangarh Ajmer Kishangarh, Rajasthan Presently residing Sindoliya, Tonk Kancholia Rajasthan. 2. Pradhan Nath S/o Shri Shankar Nath, aged about 30 Years, R/o Sindoliya, Tonk Kancholia Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. The Director General of Police, Rajasthan Police, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. The Superintendent of Police, Ajmer (Raj.). 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Jogiyo Ka Nada, Maliyo Ki Badi, Kishangarh Ajmer Rajasthan. 5. Station House Officer, Police Station Lamba Harisingh, Malpura District Tonk Rajasthan 6. Magal Nath S/o Shri Suja Nath, Resident of Jogiyo Ka Nada, Maliyo Ka Badi, Kishangarh Ajmer Kishangarh, Ra- jasthan 7. Sugan Nath S/o Shri Suja Nath, Resident of Jogiyo Ka Nada, Maliyo Ka Badi, Kishangarh Ajmer Kishangarh, Ra- jasthan 8. Kalu Nath Shri Suja Nath, Resident of Jogiyo Ka Nada, Maliyo Ka Badi, Kishangarh Ajmer Kishangarh, Rajasthan 9. Rajadevi W/o Magan Nath, Resident of Jogiyo Ka Nada, Maliyo Ka Badi, Kishangarh Ajmer Kishangarh, Rajasthan 10. Pushpa Devi W/o Sugan Nath, Resident of Jogiyo Ka Nada, Maliyo Ka Badi, Kishangarh Ajmer Kishangarh, Ra- jasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rudraksh Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 21/01/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled. [2026:RJ-JP:2842] (2 of 3) [CRLW-67/2026] 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.6 to 10 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Santha 4/14C, Joshi Bhawan, E.W.S.J.D.A Quarter, R.P.A. Road, Naya Khera, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur on 22.12.2025 and same has been registered before the Office of Marriage Registration Officer, Vidhyadhar Nagar Zone, Jaipur. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.6 to 10 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station Jogiyo Ka Nada, Maliyo Ki Badi, Kishangarh Ajmer, Rajasthan and respondent No.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. [2026:RJ-JP:2842] (3 of 3) [CRLW-67/2026] 6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /414